Year of the Fat Knight ~ Antony Sher

51Sdn5uTyaL._SX320_BO1,204,203,200_As you will by now have gathered Shakespeare is big in my life. And, because I live only an hour’s drive away from Stratford, the same is true of the Royal Shakespeare Company.  I saw them on stage for the first time in 1962 and have been a constant visitor ever since.  I have dozens of memorable productions stowed away in my memory and not a few of them have features performances by Antony Sher.

Now, I know that Sher is something of a marmite actor: you love him, or you hate him.  I have one friend who refuses to see any further performances of Richard III because she wants nothing to diminish her memory of his 1984 interpretation.  I have other friends who pointedly avoid anything he’s in.  Personally, I am a fan.

I first saw Sher in 1982 playing the Fool to Michael Gambon’s Lear.  This was not long after I had started out on what was to prove to be a nineteen year marathon during which I studied for three successive degrees at the same time as holding down a full-time job.  Going to the theatre was about the only other activity I found time for and over that period of nearly two decades Tony Sher was one of a small number of actors who never failed to stimulate me and send me out of the theatre with new ideas careering round my brain. I didn’t always agree with his interpretations (the least said about his Malvolio the better) but he was never there just to make up the numbers.  It was fitting, then, if completely unexpected, to turn up for my third and final graduation ceremony and find that he was the Honorary Graduand.  He gave a speech that day which managed to turn what had been threatening to be a very embarrassing morning, centred round a hard-nosed plea for money from the university’s Chancellor, into what it should have been, a celebration of the achievements of the young people who had worked so hard and long for their degrees.  I wrote to him afterwards to thank him and received a very generous response.  As I say, I am a fan.

I am always glad then to see another in his series of diary accounts chronicling his journey towards the creation of a new part.  There have now been three of these:  The Year of the KingWozza Shakespeare, and most recently, Year of the Fat Knight.  The first was concerned with Richard III, the second, written jointly with his partner, Greg Doran, focused on a production of Titus Andronicus staged in post Apartheid South Africa, and the third about the current production of the Henry IVs.

I love the Henry IVs.  They are up there amongst my favourite plays, especially Part II, which I think has a melancholy all of its own.  And, I have seen some cracking productions over the years.  So I was delighted when they were announced for the 2014 season with Sher cast as the reprobate, Falstaff.  I didn’t share the doubts about his ability to play the role that he seems to have had and in fact, the early sections of this journal centre around the question of whether or not he is going to agree to take the part on.  Some of the most interesting discussion focuses on why many of our greatest character actors have refused to agree to play Falstaff.  Both Derek Jacobi and Ian McKellen had turned it down before it was offered to Sher and neither Olivier nor Gielgud ever played the part.  As Sher says Gielgud would have been the Don Quixote of Falstaffs and like him I’d have paid blood to see [Scofield] do it.

Once committed to the role Sher sets about discovering the Falstaff he can play and we go on the journey with him as he mines the text for indications of what it is that makes the fat knight recognisable to us as a real human being.  This is a painstaking process and for someone like me, who is of an age with the actor, one I can empathise with, especially when he talks about the growing difficulty of learning lines.  I didn’t think that there was as much analysis of the part and of the plays as there had been in the earlier books and felt this as a loss, but there is still much discussion of the rehearsal process and given that he was talking about people I have become familiar with over the past couple of seasons and spaces that I know very well, the book was nevertheless a very enjoyable read.

The added bonus where this journal is concerned is that it is now possible to go back and watch the plays again in the light of the journey Sher has laid before us.  Recordings are available and although they will never quite catch the magic of the live performance it’s a darn sight better than not being able to see it at all.  If you are a lover of Shakespeare or simply a lover of the theatre in general then I recommend a weekend spent with this book and the DVDs of the two plays.  You won’t regret the time spent.

15 thoughts on “Year of the Fat Knight ~ Antony Sher

  1. I remember being fascinated by the preparation that went into playing Richard III when I read The Year of the King. I regret to say that I’ve never seen Sher in a Shakespeare play but I did see him in Singer years ago at the Barbican which was completely riveting.

    1. Oh that was wonderful, wasn’t it, Susan. I tend to forget about his modern roles, even though I saw him play Willie Loman early last summer. He was also excellent in Stoppard’s ‘Travesties’, again at the Barbican.

  2. Lovely post. I read Year Of The King years ago, but sadly never saw the performance. Do you know if it’s available on DVD? Sher was a wonderful Willie Loman, and I thought he and Alex Hassell were great together in The Henry IVs.

    1. Yes, it is. I’m waiting though until the Henry V is available as well in case they put out a box set of those three plus the Richard II.

  3. Sorry, I misread this very early in the morning. You’re asking about the Richard III, aren’t you. No, as far as I know it isn’t. I taught Richard last Summer and I buy all the readily available DVDs for the students to see. Sher’s wasn’t one I could get hold of. If you’re anywhere near Stratford it’s possible that the Birthplace Library has a recording that you could make an appointment to watch there.

  4. This will be perfect for my husband’s birthday since he’s read The Year of the King a few years back. Sadly I’ve not seen much of Sher in performance other than Shylock and Richard 3 with the RSC. He was superb in both, when he was on stage you had eyes for no-one else. Off stage (i.e. in chat shows and interviews) I find him too much of a luvvy.

    1. I know what you mean, Karen and I have friends who have worked with him who would say much the same. I tend to find him funny, but if I had close contact it might be different.

    1. It was completely over the top, Liz and I don’t think you can do that with Malvolio. You have to feel that here is a man Olivia’s father and brother relied on and trusted who suddenly goes off the rails or it isn’t funny/heartbreaking. Did you see Stephen Fry play the part for the Globe? He was magnificent. It’s available on DVD if you want to catch it.

      1. Yes, I saw that one on the TV and also enjoyed Richard Briars when he played the part in a TV or DVD version. I’ve seen a terrible production years ago (directed by someone like Griff Rhys Jones) which was just funny, no light and shade at all, or no shade, and that was awful.

        1. If you don’t get the melancholy in all of Shakespeare’s comedy then you don’t understand Shakespeare’s comedy and that is especially true of ‘Twelfth Night’. I think it was John Russell Brown who wrote of the ending of that play that after the last song Feste bowed us out of the garden of Shakespearian Comedy and closed the gate behind us. The next play is ‘Hamlet’.

  5. I’ve only seen him in Mrs Brown – which I started watching again last night, just to see him. I haven’t read Shakespeare in any depth – and I’m still working my way through the plays – but I like the sound of the Richard III one.

    1. You have to be careful with Shakespeare’s ‘Richard III’, Lisa. It gets Richard’s supports very angry indeed. They tend to blame Shakespeare for the way in which Richard has been seen as an out and out villain. In fact, if you explore the other literature featuring Richard that is being published at the same time, and even earlier, then in fact all Shakespeare is doing is following the crowd.

  6. Very cool and what a perfect book for you! I think most people don;t realize how much work actors put into their roles. Acting is one of those things that looks so easy we think we could all do it. Ha! But what a treat to get such a behind the scenes view.

    1. I’ve been saving it as a treat, Stefanie, and it was worth the wait. It is extremely readable and I don’t think you have to be a theatre fan to enjoy it.

Your thoughts are welcome

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s