World Book Night 2016


One of the ways of looking through the grim promise of cold, ice and snow still to come is to focus on events due to happen when the days are getting longer and, in theory at least, warmer and brighter.  April 23rd is a landmark date for me, a date when, normally, you can guarantee that the weather has taken a turn for the better and that Spring has really won the battle over its Wintery predecessor. I say ‘normally’ because I do still vividly remember queueing on the last Saturday in April, outside The Other Place, in the days when it was still first come, first seated, with the snow mounting ever higher round my boots and icicles beginning to form on the end of my nose.Normally, then, April 23rd is my day of triumph.  It is, of course, also Shakespeare’s birthday and, as we are remind this morning, World Book Night.

I haven’t taken an active part in World Book Night since the year of its inception, mainly because short of standing in the local High Street and handing out books to unsuspecting passersby, I have found it difficult to identify a local community who would welcome the gift in the numbers in which givers receive them.  The communities to which I belong are, by self-selection, already readers and, as the idea is to expand the reading population, to hand them out there would seem to be self-defeating.

Nevertheless, that doesn’t stop me taking an active interest in what books are selected each year and this morning’s announcement of the fifteen books chosen for 2016 is interesting, if only because it seems to me that it is rather more ‘populist’ than it has been in the past.  There are, for example, four first class crime novels on the list, including Sharon Bolton’s Now You See Me and Sarah Hilary’s Someone Else’s Skin.  Both of these are the first novels in compelling series and this would make them an excellent choice if what you are aiming to do is encourage the recipients to read on after World Book Night is over.  In terms of local interest, however, if I was to apply this time round I suppose I should go for Jonathan Coe’s early novel, The Rotter’s Club. This is set here in Birmingham and is a wonderfully accurate description of what it was like to grow up in the city in the 1970s.  No-one who was living here at the time could fail to recognise the landscapes, environmental, social and political, that Coe describes but a friend of mine was actually at school with the author and he says that in addition the small details are precise in a way that only someone who actually lived through the experience with Coe could possibly appreciate.

You can find the full details of the list and descriptions of all the books on the World Book Night website.  If you are intending to apply I would be really interested to know which book you would choose and the type of community to which you would gift it.  Perhaps that would give me some ideas as to how I could get involved myself this time round.

12 thoughts on “World Book Night 2016

  1. My partner lectures in contemporary history, including a module on the ’70s. He’s so impresed with its pitch perfect period detail that he’s included The Rotters’ Club on his reading list.
    I feel much the same as you about World Book Night, Alex.

    1. Paul will be fascinated by that, Susan. He often says that he feels he should dig out his old school uniform whenever he wants to revisit the novel.

      1. I’ve coined a word for H’s reaction to the many historical inaccuracies in film/TV and fiction: the anachrohumph. Suffice to say that The Rotters’ Club is a completely anachrohumph-free zone!

        1. Oh yes! Anything to do with Shakespeare is likely to bring about the same reaction in our house. I can see The Bears already getting ready to borrow your wonderful word the very next time it is appropriate.

  2. I’d like to get involved too, but like you I can see myself standing around in the cold and dark trying to force books onto uninterested locals. Tho TBH the only book that really inspires me from the list is the Duffy, and trying to give away poetry is probably not going to be received well round here! You’re right – this is *definitely* a populist list.

  3. I’m on the same wavelength as you and Kaggsy — I’d give the Duffy, because I think more people would realise they actually liked poetry if they gave it even a smidgen of a chance. But I don’t have the bottle to be a giver, and in any case I don’t live in the UK. I did get given a book myself a couple of years ago and it was brilliant, so I’m all for it in principle.

    1. I have not read The Rotter’s Club and must get round to it because I loved What A Carve Up! It can be fun donating books to community groups. I once had to let go of a lot of books and donated them to a local self help support group and I could never really tell which books would appeal to which people but there was always a lot of interest in the books donated.

      1. I am always giving books away to charity and community groups too but that is somehow different for me from having to give away the same book in large numbers. Not certain why that should be.

    2. Yes, the idea is great, Harriet, isn’t it? I think it’s the numbers that daunt me. If I was being asked to give half a dozen it would be a much easier prospect.

  4. I’ve taken part three times now, giving books out to busy parents and a few teachers at school who don’t have time to read much. Not sure if I’ll do it this year, but I’d gravitate towards the Jonathan Coe too, with maybe Ann Cleeves as backup.

    1. I really do have to get round to trying Ann Cleeves again. I feel foul of Vera because I couldn’t believe in her as a copper, but perhaps I would get on better with the Shetland series.

Your thoughts are welcome

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s