The Girl Who Fell From The Sky ~ Simon Mawer

The Girl Who Fell From the SkyI’ve had to read this book rather sooner than I would have wanted because it is my choice for a new book group I’ve joined and they like to have questions to go along with the reading. Personally, I prefer to leave a book until the week before I need to discuss it, timing my reading so that I finish it either on the day before the meeting or, even better, on the day of the meeting itself.  No such luxury this time round, three weeks before we get together I have the book polished off but will probably have to go back and do a very quick re-read just before the meeting in order to be able to talk about it in the sort of detail I like.

Of course, I could have got round the situation by choosing a book I already knew well enough to be able to suggest areas for discussion and then done a thorough re-read of it in two weeks time, but I’ve been looking for a reason to read Simon Mawer’s novel ever since it came out and its subject matter and style seem to me to be just right for this particular group, so the ‘happy coincidence’ was too much to resist.

The Girl Who Fell From The Sky (published in the US under the title Trapeze) is the story of Marian Sutro a half French, half British young woman who is recruited by the Special Operation Executive (SOE) to go undercover in France during the Second World War, in order to work with the Resistance. The reason I wanted to read it so much was that some years ago I read and very much enjoyed Leo Marks’ book Between Silk and Cyanide in which he describes his time working for SOE as the genius behind the codes on which the lives of the young men and women involved in this dangerous work could well depend.  Leo Marks was the son of the man who owned Marks and Co, better known as 84 Charing Cross Road, which is why I picked up his book, and a complete eccentric, but he understood codes and he understood the problems which the red tape surrounding them at this end could pose for the agent in the field.  From his book I got a picture of what was happening back here in London.  What I wanted from Mawer’s novel was an understanding of something of what it was like out at the other end of the story.

The novel opens as Marian is preparing to parachute into France but then immediately jumps back in time to take us through the rigorous training regime to which the recruits are subjected.  At first I was surprised at how spare Mawer’s style is but gradually I came to appreciate this because as the book progresses and we become involved in the constant terror that the agents have to live with anything less prosaic would be too much to take. The simplicity of his tone allows the very real danger of each moment nowhere to hide.

Once we have caught up with ourselves and Marion is actually in France the reality of the ‘games’ they have been playing back in England become all too apparent.  Agents are given a new identity to take with them and Marian becomes Alice and Anne-Marie and eventually, when her cover appears to have been blown, Laurence.  But, who is everybody else?  What do the identities that they are assuming at any one point in time hide?  Can you assume that anyone is who they say they are or that they can be trusted?  Having known them and trusted them in one persona is no guarantee that you can do the same now.  Even those people who have been dearest to us can change and a war-time agent can afford to assume nothing.

And assuming nothing means that Marian has to question even her beloved Clément, friend of her elder brother, Ned and her teenage idol. Clément, like Ned, is a quantum physicist, and the British establishment are desperate to get him to come over to London to continue his work on what would become the atomic bomb.  There is an ironic contrast here between the ‘safe’ distance that the likes of Ned and Clément can maintain from the act of killing and the immediacy of death that Marian and her fellow agents have to face every day.  And who is the more important to the powers that be?  I wouldn’t say that Mawer gives the impression that the agents are not valued by those who send them out but there is definitely a feeling that if it were to come to a choice between Clément’s safety and hers it is the scientist who would win out every time.

Ultimately, however, Marian’s safety is threatened by a number of factors. Mawer raises the issue of the poem-codes which, in their earliest manifestation, made sending messages such a dangerous enterprise and which drove Leo Marks almost to distraction. There is also the frailty of those around her who, understandably, have priorities other than her survival.  But, perhaps most importantly there is Marian’s inability to see beyond her own role.  I wouldn’t go so far as to say that she has a death wish, but her insistence on carrying on with the task she has been given even after her cover has been blown and she has inevitably become a risk to those with whom she is involved smacks of obsession.  Perhaps that had to be part of your make-up even to think of doing a job like this.

Overall, I was impressed with this book.  Mawer makes clear the dangers and difficulties faced by the agents without ever becoming over emotional and never romanticising.  When it comes to having to re-read it quickly in a couple of weeks time that will be no penance at all.

Advertisements

17 thoughts on “The Girl Who Fell From The Sky ~ Simon Mawer

  1. I loved this book. I agree that Mawer’s writing does seem surprisingly simple, but it is a real sign of his skill as an author when you realise how much depth and emotion he manages to pack in to so few words. I haven’t heard of ‘Between Silk and Cyanide’ before, but now you’ve intrigued me about the other end of the story, so I’ll try and get my hands on a copy – thanks for the recommendation!

    1. Be warned, although Marks writes very well indeed, I suspect he was somewhere at the far end of the Asperger’s spectrum and there are times when he gives you far more information than ordinary mortals (and he was certainly no ordinary mortal) can possibly process. What does come over on every page, however, is his concern for the agents in the field and his absolute resolve that no petty-fogging middle manager was going to stop him doing everything he could to make conditions safer for them.

  2. A spy story that doesn’t romanticize it? Is it me or do those seem few and far between? This sounds quite good. I can imagine your book group will make a lively discussion out of it.

    1. That’s the power of the spare style Mawer adopts, Stefanie. I’ve never read anything else by him so I don’t know if this is typical, but it certainly works in his favour here.

  3. Ooh I really want to read this one, and guess what, I own a copy! Your review has just moved it up the list. I read a lot of spy fiction in the summer and felt I needed a breather from it, but I reckon I could squeeze another one in now. I really enjoyed the spy novels I read – it seems like the genre is enjoying a wonderful revival.

    1. It’s interesting that although clearly that is what this is, I never really thought of it as a spy novel. Perhaps that is why the genre is enjoying such a comeback – authors are finding different ways to write about what had become a rather hackneyed convention.

  4. I’ve seen books by Simon Mawer several times before but have never been tempted. At the risk of sounding ridiculous, I’ve always been put off by the book covers! However, this sounds like my kind of book so i will give it a go ( even though I don’t warm to the cover of this one either!!!!) I also loved your Aspergers diagnosis of Marks from the way he writes – very funny!

    1. It’s the detail he goes into that gives it away, Col. That and the fact that he is very clearly remembering all of it verbatim. His memory and his ability to crack codes are simply phenomenal.

  5. This sounds good! I’m like you and much prefer to finish the book as close to the book group meeting time as absolutely possible. My poor memory has a lot to do with that! Since my husband and I are part of the same book group, and we share one copy of the book, I’m lucky I can get him to read the book first 🙂

    1. My trouble Rebecca, is that I read so much and get so involved in what I’m reading if the book for discussion isn’t the last one I’ve read my mind is so wrapped up in the current favourite that the group book doesn’t stand a chance. I shall have to re-read this over next weekend or I shall never be able to lead the meeting.

  6. Gosh that book group is a demanding bunch – questions in advance indeed! As for this book, I thought it was very disappointing, particularly the ending. I just couldn’t engage with Marian at all

    1. Well, as we’ve said before, Karen, if we all liked the same books it would be a very dull world and a lot of authors would never get a look in. Is it just this book or do you find Mawer difficult in general?

      1. it was the first encounter with Mr Mawer – this experience wouldn’t put me off reading another by him. And yes, absolutely, there would be no fun if we agreed on everything..

  7. I loved this book and the detail Mr Mawer included. However, the ending bothered me a lot. All the way through the novel Marian behaved in a manner that was strong, caring, and intelligent, while still acting somewhat impulsively like a 19 year old. Many of the male characters told her that women could not handle the life of a spy, and she proved them wrong, which I loved.
    However, at the end she behaves in a stupid and uncaring manner and stays in France even though she knows her cover is blown, risking herself and her cohorts. (I feel that risking yourself is okay, but needlessly risking those around you is wrong.) This act seems to prove that the feelings of her male cohorts were correct, and that the spy life is not for women. I wonder if Mr Mawer ended that way to allow for the writing of a sequel, or if Marion’s behavior was based on the actual behavior of Britain’s female spies and that they were caught because they were stupid. I believe that of the nearly 40 British female spies like Marion around half were caught and killed. I doubt that they had been caught because they were stupid and impulsive like Marion, instead I would like to assume that they were intelligent, smart, and courageous, and it was just an extremely dangerous position to be in. (I am starting to read the non fiction book, The Women who Lived for Danger, which is a factual account of the British female spies. )
    I look forward to reading other books by Simon Mawer such as The Glass Room.

    1. My understanding is that Mawer’s next novel will be a sequel although he was not prepared to say whether it would follow on immediately in time, in fact the impression I was left with was that it certainly wouldn’t. I understand what you are saying about the ending and it certainly caused some discussion in the book group I read it with.

Your thoughts are welcome

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s