Easter Read-In ~ 2 ‘Life After Life’ ~ Kate Atkinson

imagesFor all sorts of reasons it took me a lot longer to read Life After Life, Kate Atkinson’s new novel, than I thought it was going to.  In one respect I didn’t really mind this, as it is the sort of book you don’t want to finish.  I was deeply involved with many of the characters, not the least Ursula, the main protagonist, and before anyone says it, that wasn’t just because she is so frequently referred to as ‘little bear’.  Also, being me, I was intrigued by the way in which the book is structured, with the narrative line of Ursula’s life cycling back on itself time after time as she is ‘given’ repeated opportunities to walk her path in a different way deliberately nudging the life stories of those around her as she goes.  So I was sorry when I eventually had to close the book for the last time and glad that I spent rather longer in the company of the Todd family than I had anticipated.

However, in another way, reading this over an extended period caused problems most of which stemmed from that same structure, intriguing though it is.  For the first half of the book (250 pages or so) which I read over a single day, I was doing fine.  I was keeping the different characters, their relationships to each other and the way in which they were involved in the action reasonably straight and when something different happened, or when a character who had been missing in the previous life but had been in earlier ones turned up, my sharply honed reading skills pinned what was going on. But, having lost almost a whole day and with the time lines through which Ursula lives becoming longer and  increasingly complex, this became more and more difficult.  And, as I suspect that most people will have to read it over four or five days, I would suggest that before you embark on a novel that, despite all my misgivings, I think demands to be read, you invest in a notebook in which to jot down a few important names as you go.

Having said all that I think that whatever the circumstances in which I had read Life After Life I would have wanted to find an excuse to re-read it because I don’t feel this is a book that gives up all its secrets just on one reading.  There is so much going on here and I, at least, was so beguiled by the slightly ironic narrative voice, that I am sure I missed not only the relationship between some of the ‘lives’ but also many clues as to the reason why Ursula, having died repeatedly, keeps goes back to that snowy February day in 1910 and starting all over again. (And while we’re about it, what about some sympathy for Sylvie, her mother, who has to keep giving birth to her on umpteen dozen occasions.)  In one of her final times round Dr Kellet (nice chap, turns up quite often) asks her if she knows what reincarnation is, but that isn’t quite what Ursula is experiencing.  As I understand it, if one is reincarnated one comes back in a future time and as someone else.  In Ursula’s case each time she dies and is reborn it is as herself and in the same place and time as before. She comes back, presumably, because she has a role to fulfil that either her premature death or the path that she has followed, has prevented.  Perhaps she has a life to save or even a life to take.  Whatever the reason, each time she feels the darkness taking her over, as a reader I was glad that she was going to have another chance to reshape what had happened to her in the life she had just experienced.

But, there is more going on here than just that, I’m sure.  What, for example, are we meant to make of the occasion when Ursula recognises that she is not going to die and is forced to face a life she no longer wants to live?

What a world of difference there was between dying and nearly dying. One’s whole life, in fact. Ursula felt she had no use for the life that she had been saved for.

Or the later instance, clearly signalled as a turning point:

She had never chosen death over life before and as she was leaving she knew something had cracked and broken and the order of things had changed.

I haven’t got a strong enough grasp of quite what is happening here yet or of whether it is significant that several of the early deaths come about because of the way in which women were either treated or expected to behave in the opening decades of the twentieth century. I need to go back and start again but of one thing I am sure, this is a book that is worth reading twice.

So, any members of the book groups to which I belong reading this be warned, you know what my next choice is going to be.  Buy your copy now.


16 thoughts on “Easter Read-In ~ 2 ‘Life After Life’ ~ Kate Atkinson

  1. Much to reflect on as a social commentary, in addition to the original structure and interesting story(ies).

    I was left wondering what happens when/if she dies of old age? Is that a kind of nirvana that breaks the cycle? Who knows.

    I am intrigued to learn that Kate Atkinson is thinking of writing the story of Teddy, in which one of Ursula’s lives would that be I wonder? Or will we discover he has inherited the same gene? Maybe they all live different lives, oh the possibilities are endless! Not what one usually is left thinking about at the end of a book.

    1. I was so bound up with trying to keep track of all the details, Claire, that I hadn’t really given enough thought to the narrative implications of what’s happening here but your mention of the possible sequel focusing on Teddy has jolted me back into my ‘real’ world and made me wonder what the is saying about the nature of story, how it relates to real life and how it differs depending on whose perspective you are telling it from. I really am going to have to go back and revisit this book as soon as I can.

  2. I want to reread this as well. The first read seemed to be all about making the connections between her lives and just getting to know her, but I too noted a few hints at something more going on. I doubt that there’s a clear answer buried underneath, but I think it would be fun to dig in and explore it all a little more.

    1. I’m sure your right, Teresa and there is no one clear answer. In fact, I suspect that if we try to force the boo into a single meaning we’ll miss much of what is special about it. But still, like you, I’m going to have to give it at least one more read.

  3. I think I am 68th in the library queue for this book – and I’ll only be able to keep it for two weeks, so it will be on the top of my reading stack as soon as it arrives (to make the waiting even worse, it’s still listed as “on order”).

    1. I don’t suppose there’s any chance they’ve ordered seventy copies, is there Lisa? I noticed our local service has forty-five copies of the paperback of ‘Bring Up The Bodies’ on order. Still, it is definitely worth waiting for and putting some time to one side as soon as it is available.

  4. This truly sounds interesting. Before I got to the paragraph of you talking about reincarnation, the word already popped up in my head. I was thinking “she was reincarnated as herself repeatedly”! I would like that for myself, I think this book will evoke strong feelings in me – the need to correct some mistakes…?
    I will consider your recommendation 🙂

    1. The trouble is that she is only really able to access those previous lives as a ghostly sort of déjà vu and her attempts to change what happened, especially as a child, are often meet with disapproval from the adults around her. However, I agree, there are certainly things I would like to go back and alter in my own past life.

    1. If I put it forward to my reading groups I will have to get my own copy as well, Stefanie. The waiting list at the library is now too long to measure let alone count.

  5. This is also on my list of books I will definitely read. I’m probably waiting for the paperback to come out, though, unless I can find a really cheap hardback online in a couple of months. But I’m so intrigued by the device. Reincarnation was a popular topic for a while in genre romance (men were more courteous in times past, I fear), but as you say, this isn’t reincarnation. What it reminds me of most is an X-Files episode where Scully and Mulder keep going back in time in order to prevent a bank heist from turning into a massacre. I was particularly struck by that episode and am most curious to see what Kate Atkinson does with a similar device.

    1. I knew there was a reason why I should have watched The X Files. I love the way in which good science fiction forces you to sit back and consider the way you operate in your own life.

  6. I’ve enjoyed Atkinson novels before, and this one is tempting, but I’m wary of any book that might require one to keep a notebook with a description of the characters, as I’m terrible at keeping characters and plot points straight. Years of reading hasn’t really made me better at this! I’m just not that invested in plot, generally. But it might be worth a go anyway, we’ll see. I’m glad you enjoyed it.

    1. I find myself going back to it at odd moment during the day, Rebecca, even though I’ve read a couple of other books since then. That says a lot about a book, I think.

Your thoughts are welcome

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s